The family of the late Sharon Otieno, a Rongo University student, has petitioned the court for compensation after enduring almost eight years of financial and emotional hardship following her murder.
In a victim impact statement submitted before sentencing, the family highlighted the extensive costs and trauma they have faced since Sharon’s death, including the loss of her unborn child. They expressed readiness to forgive those responsible and begin healing.
Financial Strain and Emotional Toll
- The family estimates spending around KSh1.2 million on court appearances over several years.
- They also incurred approximately KSh3.5 million in funeral and burial expenses.
- To cover these costs, they sold a one-acre plot of land and a cow.
- Ongoing responsibilities include providing for Sharon’s three surviving children, her aging parents, and other dependents.
- The family struggles to meet basic needs such as education, healthcare, food, and housing.
The relatives detailed the psychological impact of the murder and extended legal process, citing stress, anxiety, and trauma. They have requested the court to facilitate access to mental health support services to aid their recovery.
Impact on Sharon’s Children and Family
Sharon’s children, particularly the two younger ones, continue to grapple with her absence, frequently asking their grandparents about their mother. The family finds it difficult to explain the circumstances of her death to them.
The brutal nature of Sharon’s killing has compounded the family’s grief, making it challenging to find closure.
Reconciliation Efforts
The family has shown willingness to forgive and engage with some relatives of the accused. Representatives of the first accused, including close family members, have met with them and pledged to honor promises made to Sharon before her death. However, attempts to reconcile with the second accused’s family failed, and no contact has been made by relatives of the third accused.
Call for Comprehensive Consideration
In their submission, the family urged the court to factor in the economic losses, psychological trauma, welfare of Sharon’s children, and the needs of the broader family when sentencing the perpetrators. They believe compensation would help alleviate their long-standing burden and support rebuilding their lives after this profound tragedy.